Subscribe to keep up to date with the latest research, resources, news and events from The Deck.
You can also sign up to Q Shelter’s monthly newsletter, Home Matters.
Zhigang Wei, Hugh M. McDonald and Christine Coumarelos
Fines are used extensively in all Australian jurisdictions to address low-level lawbreaking.
If ignored, fines automatically escalate into increased penalties and additional enforcement proceedings.
Based on the Legal Australia-Wide (LAW) Survey, 2.7 per cent of the Australian population experience problems with fines in a 12-month period. Other literature indicates that fines can be problematic for disadvantaged groups because they lack the financial capacity to pay them.
This paper adds to the literature by using population-level data from the LAW Survey to examine whether the prevalence of problems with fines is higher for disadvantaged groups than others.
It also investigates whether people’s responses to fines problems and the outcomes they achieve for these problems varies by disadvantage.
The findings reveal that fines disproportionately affect disadvantaged people.
Most of the disadvantaged groups examined had elevated experiences of fines problems, including substantial fines problems.
These groups included Indigenous people, single parents, people in disadvantaged housing, people on government benefits, people with a disability and unemployed people.
Furthermore, the adverse consequences resulting from fines problems increased as the level of disadvantage increased.
Disadvantaged people were also less likely to have the financial and legal capability to handle their fines problems satisfactorily.
They were less likely to take any type of action, and, consequently, were less likely to finalise these problems.
Notably, inaction in response to fines problems was linked to less favourable outcomes.
These findings suggest a vicious cycle of fines, disadvantage and debt whereby heightened vulnerability to fines, inaction, further penalty and adverse consequences can compound disadvantage.
However, the findings also suggest that when disadvantaged people do get appropriate assistance for their fines problems, they achieve outcomes on par with others.
In particular, the use of not-for-profit legal services was the strategy most likely to produce favourable outcomes.